Crow vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,784,620 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.553. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.049% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 49.3 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 31.4%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $81,064, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $94,517, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $37,298, a difference of 5.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $51,615, a difference of 9.8%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $43,844, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 102.7%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 84.4%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 78.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 30.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 35.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 233.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 232.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 231.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.7%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.31, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.91%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.69%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 68.8%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 18.7%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.59%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.89%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.2%).