Choctaw vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,266,977 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.578. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.093% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 93.1 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($69,947 compared to $81,064, a difference of 15.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $94,517, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $51,615, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $50,772, a difference of 6.4%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $39,194, a difference of 8.9%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $43,844, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 38.8%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 34.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.2%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.59%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 52.7%), bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and associate's degree (37.8% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.17%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 44.9%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.0%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.5%).