Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Malaysians

Exceptional
Fair
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,307,476 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.510% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 510.5 Malaysians.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Malaysian Communities

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $39,194, a difference of 20.9%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $95,230, a difference of 14.3%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $50,772, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $51,615, a difference of 0.58%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $58,244, a difference of 9.3%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,394
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,830
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,496
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,913
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,352
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,527
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,914
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,880
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$104,992
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,643
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Excellent
25.0%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 27.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.24%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweMalaysian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.1%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
12.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweMalaysian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.5%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
82.0%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.7%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.050%), currently married (46.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.31, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweMalaysian
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
33.9%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 18.4%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.6%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 55.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.1%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.95%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.96%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.6%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweMalaysian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%