Bhutanese vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Malaysians

Exceptional
Fair
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,616,758 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 3.8 Malaysians.
Bhutanese Integration in Malaysian Communities

Bhutanese vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,894 compared to $39,194, a difference of 27.3%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $95,230, a difference of 25.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $94,517, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 7.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $51,615, a difference of 10.6%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $37,298, a difference of 17.0%).
Bhutanese vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricBhutaneseMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Excellent
25.0%

Bhutanese vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 40.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 39.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.21%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.3%).
Bhutanese vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseMalaysian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.7%

Bhutanese vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Bhutanese vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseMalaysian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.5%

Bhutanese vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Bhutanese vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
82.0%

Bhutanese vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 38.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.31, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Bhutanese vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseMalaysian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
33.9%

Bhutanese vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Bhutanese vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.7%

Bhutanese vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 60.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.5%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Bhutanese vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Bhutanese vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.6%).
Bhutanese vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseMalaysian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%