Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Carpatho Rusyn
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Carpatho Rusyns

Malaysians

Good
Fair
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,727,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.064% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to a decrease of 63.5 Malaysians.
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Malaysian Communities

Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $39,194, a difference of 20.5%), median male earnings ($57,572 compared to $50,772, a difference of 13.4%), and median family income ($107,502 compared to $95,230, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $58,244, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $51,615, a difference of 5.1%), and median household income ($86,635 compared to $81,064, a difference of 6.9%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricCarpatho RusynMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,248
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,502
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Good
$86,635
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,617
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,572
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,825
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,113
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,449
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,777
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,093
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Excellent
25.0%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.8%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 27.7%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 2.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 5.8%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricCarpatho RusynMalaysian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.0%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.7%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.0%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCarpatho RusynMalaysian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Fair
5.5%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCarpatho RusynMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
87.0%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.2%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
82.0%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.2%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (47.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCarpatho RusynMalaysian
Family Households
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Tragic
33.9%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 38.5%), no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 38.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 25.4%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCarpatho RusynMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
7.7%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 101.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.3%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricCarpatho RusynMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.1%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.9%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.1%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 17.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.39%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.67%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricCarpatho RusynMalaysian
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%