Romanian vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Malaysians

Excellent
Fair
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,791,335 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 49.2 Malaysians.
Romanian Integration in Malaysian Communities

Romanian vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $39,194, a difference of 23.6%), median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $50,772, a difference of 18.3%), and median family income ($111,243 compared to $95,230, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $51,615, a difference of 3.9%), householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $58,244, a difference of 10.1%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.6%).
Romanian vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricRomanianMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Excellent
25.0%

Romanian vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 21.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Romanian vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianMalaysian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.7%

Romanian vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Romanian vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianMalaysian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.3%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.5%

Romanian vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.85%).
Romanian vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
82.0%

Romanian vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.7%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.31, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Romanian vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianMalaysian
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
33.9%

Romanian vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.2%).
Romanian vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.7%

Romanian vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 55.7%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 55.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Romanian vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Romanian vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.4%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%).
Romanian vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricRomanianMalaysian
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%