Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,432,282 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 7.6 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $119,496, a difference of 11.8%), median household income ($95,319 compared to $105,262, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $122,343, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.1%), per capita income ($51,770 compared to $53,874, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $70,238, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.13%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and female poverty (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.7%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.81%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (63.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 19.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.2%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 19.4%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.1%).