Finnish vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 379,643,488 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to a decrease of 17.1 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $119,496, a difference of 26.3%), median household income ($83,607 compared to $105,262, a difference of 25.9%), and per capita income ($43,461 compared to $53,874, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $58,239, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $70,238, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 22.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and single male poverty (13.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.26%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 37.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.0%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 25.3%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (48.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 83.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 69.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 60.1%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 58.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 40.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.41%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.5%).