Immigrants from Jamaica vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,159,093 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.504. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.058% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 58.4 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,298 compared to $119,496, a difference of 43.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,035 compared to $122,343, a difference of 40.6%), and wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $58,239, a difference of 14.1%), median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $46,481, a difference of 20.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,027 compared to $70,238, a difference of 30.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 75.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 52.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.6%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 63.7%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 53.6%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.69%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 45.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.24%), no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 112.9%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 82.8%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.070%), 2nd grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 33.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 32.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.3%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.3%).