Czechoslovakian vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 346,026,826 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.394. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.078% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to a decrease of 78.0 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $119,496, a difference of 25.7%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $105,262, a difference of 23.9%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $53,874, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $58,239, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $70,238, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 24.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.38%), poverty (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 31.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 26.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.34%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 79.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 62.5%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 55.0%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.28%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 50.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.3%).