Bhutanese vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 429,961,918 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.667. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.317% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 316.6 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $119,496, a difference of 9.1%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $53,874, a difference of 8.0%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $56,253, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $58,239, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $70,238, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 20.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 0.52%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.47%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.9%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.19%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.3% compared to 70.8%, a difference of 0.61%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%).