Immigrants from Cabo Verde vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,727,450 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Cabo Verde communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.341. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cabo Verde within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.150% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cabo Verde corresponds to a decrease of 150.3 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($46,654 compared to $70,238, a difference of 50.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,542 compared to $122,343, a difference of 46.5%), and median household income ($73,515 compared to $105,262, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,520 compared to $58,239, a difference of 15.3%), and median female earnings ($38,208 compared to $46,481, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (23.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 147.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 52.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father poverty (17.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 55.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 54.8%), and male unemployment (7.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 40.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.9% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 87.6%), births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 67.1%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (61.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (3.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 68.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 40.9%), and no vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (81.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (43.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and no vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 120.7%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 111.3%), and master's degree (11.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 80.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (96.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%), 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 68.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 65.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.0%), disability age over 75 (52.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and cognitive disability (19.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 17.9%).