Austrian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,166,243 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.943. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.074% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 74.4 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,116 compared to $37,464, a difference of 28.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,842 compared to $80,544, a difference of 26.4%), and median male earnings ($59,359 compared to $47,177, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $50,691, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($64,470 compared to $61,000, a difference of 5.7%), and median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $35,477, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 35.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.5%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.37%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.52%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 59.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 56.0%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 43.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 8.3%).