Canadian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,765,731 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.503. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.054% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 54.0 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $37,464, a difference of 22.4%), median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $47,177, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $80,544, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $61,000, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $50,691, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $35,477, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 28.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.34%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.8%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 45.7%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 46.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 4.3%).