Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Immigrants from Micronesia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Immigrants from Micronesia
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,843,802 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.952. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.556% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 556.3 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $80,544, a difference of 18.0%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $47,177, a difference of 17.4%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $37,464, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $61,000, a difference of 0.69%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $50,691, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $35,477, a difference of 9.2%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Tragic $37,464 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Tragic $90,345 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Tragic $75,574 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Tragic $41,133 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Tragic $47,177 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Tragic $35,477 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Tragic $50,691 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Tragic $80,544 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Tragic $87,864 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Average $61,000 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 31.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 15.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 18.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Tragic 23.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 31.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 5.6% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.75%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Exceptional 77.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 83.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 81.1% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.9%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.62%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Average 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Fair 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 44.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Tragic 45.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Poor 32.9% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Fair 55.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 20.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 34.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Tragic 61.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 54.8% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 40.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 50.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Tragic 50.1% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.7% |