Crow vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,611,936 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.926. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 50.9 Immigrants from Micronesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 28.3%), householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $61,000, a difference of 23.9%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $75,574, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $35,477, a difference of 0.60%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $41,133, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $50,691, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 74.2%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 71.9%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.65%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 22.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 39.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 217.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 213.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 212.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.9%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 22.8%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.32, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.44%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.18%), college, 1 year or more (54.5% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 23.3%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 1.0%), male disability (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.5%).