Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Romania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Micronesia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Romania

Immigrants from Micronesia

Exceptional
Fair
9,314
SOCIAL INDEX
90.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
21st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Micronesia Integration in Immigrants from Romania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,524,819 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.702. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.833% in Immigrants from Micronesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to an increase of 1,833.3 Immigrants from Micronesia.
Immigrants from Romania Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,463 compared to $37,464, a difference of 32.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,713 compared to $80,544, a difference of 30.0%), and median male earnings ($61,040 compared to $47,177, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,462 compared to $61,000, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $50,691, a difference of 9.5%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 10.5%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,463
Tragic
$37,464
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$113,434
Tragic
$90,345
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,222
Tragic
$75,574
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,337
Tragic
$41,133
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,040
Tragic
$47,177
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,718
Tragic
$35,477
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,522
Tragic
$50,691
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,713
Tragic
$80,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,633
Tragic
$87,864
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,462
Average
$61,000
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
24.4%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 34.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 30.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 14.8%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.0%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
18.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
23.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.2%
Tragic
31.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Poor
5.6%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Exceptional
77.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
81.1%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.41%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Average
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Fair
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
44.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
45.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Poor
32.9%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.5%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 0.69%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.1%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Fair
55.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
20.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
7.6%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 66.1%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 64.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.1%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.4%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Tragic
61.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Tragic
54.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.9%
Tragic
40.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.9%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Micronesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 29.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 8.9%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.1%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Micronesia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from RomaniaImmigrants from Micronesia
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Tragic
50.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%