Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,645,557 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.389% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 389.2 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $110,787, a difference of 13.2%), median household income ($89,496 compared to $99,933, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $116,566, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,394 compared to $49,741, a difference of 5.0%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $67,594, a difference of 6.2%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $44,198, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.4%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.52%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 13.2%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.5%), currently married (46.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.0%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.7%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.9% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.33%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.3%).