Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,351,189 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.892% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to a decrease of 892.0 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($92,225 compared to $99,933, a difference of 8.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,304 compared to $116,566, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $67,594, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($50,417 compared to $49,741, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($43,258 compared to $44,198, a difference of 2.2%), and wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.53%), female poverty (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (25.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 12.2%), births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.6%), no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.2%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.92%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.5%).