Pima vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,320,717 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 44.4 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $49,741, a difference of 62.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $116,566, a difference of 58.9%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $99,933, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $56,379, a difference of 9.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $44,198, a difference of 25.1%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 135.6%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 131.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 118.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.20%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 46.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 53.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 165.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 133.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 127.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 100.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 92.2%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.18%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.27, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 99.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 90.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 84.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.41%), 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 79.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 73.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.090%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.6%).