Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,723,638 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 42.5 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $67,594, a difference of 7.0%), median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $63,240, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $53,310, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.070%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $99,933, a difference of 0.22%), and per capita income ($49,894 compared to $49,741, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.2%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.31%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 24.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.3%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.73%).