Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Immigrants from Asia

Excellent
Excellent
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,277
SOCIAL INDEX
80.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
80th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Asia Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,982,145 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.531. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.286% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to a decrease of 1,285.8 Immigrants from Asia.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Asia Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($95,319 compared to $99,933, a difference of 4.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $116,566, a difference of 4.2%), and per capita income ($51,770 compared to $49,741, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $44,198, a difference of 1.4%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $63,240, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Asia
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Exceptional
$49,741
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Exceptional
$118,291
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Exceptional
$99,933
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Exceptional
$53,310
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Exceptional
$63,240
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Exceptional
$44,198
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Exceptional
$56,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Exceptional
$110,787
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Exceptional
$116,566
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Exceptional
$67,594
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
27.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 9.9%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.48%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Asia
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
13.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
18.6%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
26.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Asia
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Good
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Asia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.3%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 10.0%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.16%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Asia
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
28.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
49.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
26.8%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.5%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Asia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Fair
89.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Excellent
56.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
6.8%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.8%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.15%), associate's degree (51.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and college, under 1 year (69.6% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 0.56%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Asia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Exceptional
69.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Exceptional
64.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Exceptional
52.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Exceptional
44.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
18.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.40%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Asia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Asia
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Good
47.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%