Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,191,235 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 20.4 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $110,787, a difference of 14.0%), median household income ($89,412 compared to $99,933, a difference of 11.8%), and median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $63,240, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $67,594, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $44,198, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 13.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.31%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.50%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.2%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.73%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 25.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.3%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.8% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.39%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.8%).