Romanian vs Fijian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Fijian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Fijians

Excellent
Fair
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,167
SOCIAL INDEX
29.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
230th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Fijian Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,018,928 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.904% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 904.0 Fijians.
Romanian Integration in Fijian Communities

Romanian vs Fijian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $36,690, a difference of 32.0%), median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $45,607, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,544 compared to $79,956, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $50,132, a difference of 7.0%), householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $56,768, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $35,114, a difference of 18.6%).
Romanian vs Fijian Income
Income MetricRomanianFijian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Tragic
$36,690
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Tragic
$87,387
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Tragic
$74,205
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Tragic
$40,193
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Tragic
$45,607
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Tragic
$35,114
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Tragic
$50,132
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Tragic
$79,956
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Tragic
$85,187
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Tragic
$56,768
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
22.9%

Romanian vs Fijian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 24.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
Romanian vs Fijian Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianFijian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
14.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
18.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.0%

Romanian vs Fijian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Romanian vs Fijian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianFijian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
3.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Romanian vs Fijian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Romanian vs Fijian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianFijian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
80.2%

Romanian vs Fijian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 41.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.1%), currently married (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Romanian vs Fijian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianFijian
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Fair
46.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Fair
32.3%

Romanian vs Fijian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.1%).
Romanian vs Fijian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianFijian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.8%

Romanian vs Fijian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 86.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 80.5%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.71%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%).
Romanian vs Fijian Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianFijian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
94.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
91.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
88.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
86.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
81.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
57.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Tragic
51.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
37.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Tragic
28.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
10.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.1%

Romanian vs Fijian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.7%).
Romanian vs Fijian Disability
Disability MetricRomanianFijian
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%