Canadian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,639,944 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 75.4 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $45,607, a difference of 25.6%), per capita income ($45,858 compared to $36,690, a difference of 25.0%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $50,132, a difference of 4.4%), householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $56,768, a difference of 9.6%), and median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $35,114, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.1%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.8%), and receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 31.8%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 76.4%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 59.8%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.85%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and male disability (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.0%).