Immigrants from Croatia vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,965,863 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.860. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.946% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 945.7 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,417 compared to $36,690, a difference of 37.4%), median male earnings ($60,914 compared to $45,607, a difference of 33.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,503 compared to $79,956, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $50,132, a difference of 8.4%), householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $56,768, a difference of 11.3%), and wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 32.6%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 30.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 53.5%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and family households with children (25.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (47.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (63.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.1%), no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 37.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 83.2%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 80.2%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 30.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.0%).