Czechoslovakian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,710,353 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.093% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 93.2 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 23.1%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $45,607, a difference of 21.4%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $36,690, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $50,132, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $56,768, a difference of 6.7%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $35,114, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.7%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.14%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.3%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.36, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 0.72%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 58.7%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 53.0%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.60%), male disability (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.6%).