Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,008,669 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.021% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to a decrease of 1,021.3 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $36,690, a difference of 41.1%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $45,607, a difference of 36.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $79,956, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $50,132, a difference of 8.4%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $56,768, a difference of 16.9%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 35.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 34.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.54%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 31.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 35.2%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.7%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.3%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 109.4%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 98.9%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 80.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 32.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 28.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 8.7%).