Luxembourger vs Fijian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Fijian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Fijians

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,167
SOCIAL INDEX
29.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
230th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Fijian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,519,269 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.588% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 588.4 Fijians.
Luxembourger Integration in Fijian Communities

Luxembourger vs Fijian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $36,690, a difference of 24.5%), median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $45,607, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $79,956, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $50,132, a difference of 0.49%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $56,768, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $35,114, a difference of 13.6%).
Luxembourger vs Fijian Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerFijian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$36,690
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$87,387
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$74,205
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$40,193
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$45,607
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$35,114
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$50,132
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$79,956
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$85,187
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$56,768
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.9%

Luxembourger vs Fijian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 48.9%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 42.5%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 9.1%).
Luxembourger vs Fijian Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerFijian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
31.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
13.0%

Luxembourger vs Fijian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Luxembourger vs Fijian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerFijian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
3.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%

Luxembourger vs Fijian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Luxembourger vs Fijian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerFijian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.2%

Luxembourger vs Fijian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.2%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.5%).
Luxembourger vs Fijian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerFijian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Fair
46.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Fair
32.3%

Luxembourger vs Fijian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 77.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.5%).
Luxembourger vs Fijian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerFijian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.8%

Luxembourger vs Fijian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 71.6%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.7%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.97%).
Luxembourger vs Fijian Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerFijian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
94.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
91.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
88.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
86.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
81.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
57.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
51.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
37.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
28.7%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
10.3%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.1%

Luxembourger vs Fijian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 26.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.0%).
Luxembourger vs Fijian Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerFijian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%