Taiwanese vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Celtics

Good
Average
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,135,485 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 52.3 Celtics.
Taiwanese Integration in Celtic Communities

Taiwanese vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $92,241, a difference of 10.0%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $83,193, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $50,447, a difference of 1.3%), median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $54,242, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,894 compared to $60,608, a difference of 3.8%).
Taiwanese vs Celtic Income
Income MetricTaiwaneseCeltic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
27.3%

Taiwanese vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 32.8%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 29.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Taiwanese vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwaneseCeltic
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Average
12.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Good
8.8%
Males
Good
11.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Good
13.1%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Excellent
10.9%

Taiwanese vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 41.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Taiwanese vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwaneseCeltic
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.4%

Taiwanese vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Taiwanese vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwaneseCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
81.8%

Taiwanese vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.9%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.43%), family households (63.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Taiwanese vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwaneseCeltic
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Poor
33.3%

Taiwanese vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 44.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.94%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.2%).
Taiwanese vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwaneseCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.1%

Taiwanese vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 52.6%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (66.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.63%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.91%).
Taiwanese vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwaneseCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
1.9%

Taiwanese vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.9%).
Taiwanese vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricTaiwaneseCeltic
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%