Brazilian vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Celtics

Good
Average
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,617,967 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Celtics.
Brazilian Integration in Celtic Communities

Brazilian vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $50,447, a difference of 7.7%), per capita income ($46,700 compared to $43,621, a difference of 7.1%), and median household income ($88,934 compared to $83,193, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $60,608, a difference of 1.4%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $54,242, a difference of 4.8%).
Brazilian vs Celtic Income
Income MetricBrazilianCeltic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.3%

Brazilian vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 23.1%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.4%), family poverty (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and poverty (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
Brazilian vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianCeltic
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Average
12.3%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Good
8.8%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Excellent
10.9%

Brazilian vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Brazilian vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianCeltic
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.4%

Brazilian vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Brazilian vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
81.8%

Brazilian vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 9.6%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.17%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.3%).
Brazilian vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianCeltic
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Poor
33.3%

Brazilian vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.8%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.4%).
Brazilian vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
7.1%

Brazilian vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.3%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%).
Brazilian vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
1.9%

Brazilian vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.1%).
Brazilian vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianCeltic
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%