Japanese vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,153,883 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.348. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 14.6%), per capita income ($39,870 compared to $43,621, a difference of 9.4%), and median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $54,242, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($83,395 compared to $83,193, a difference of 0.24%), median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $38,283, a difference of 0.64%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,624 compared to $92,241, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.84%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.8%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and family households with children (29.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.3%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.52%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 105.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.1%).