Bhutanese vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Celtics

Exceptional
Average
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,901,380 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Celtics.
Bhutanese Integration in Celtic Communities

Bhutanese vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($100,151 compared to $83,193, a difference of 20.4%), householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $60,608, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $98,896, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $50,447, a difference of 13.1%), and median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $54,242, a difference of 13.9%).
Bhutanese vs Celtic Income
Income MetricBhutaneseCeltic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.3%

Bhutanese vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 34.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 33.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.7%).
Bhutanese vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseCeltic
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Average
12.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
10.9%

Bhutanese vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.20%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.95%).
Bhutanese vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseCeltic
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%

Bhutanese vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Bhutanese vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
81.8%

Bhutanese vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 19.5%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Bhutanese vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseCeltic
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Poor
33.3%

Bhutanese vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.1%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.7%).
Bhutanese vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.1%

Bhutanese vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.1%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Bhutanese vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
1.9%

Bhutanese vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 43.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.35%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.3%).
Bhutanese vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseCeltic
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%