Choctaw vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Celtics

Fair
Average
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,776,048 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Celtics.
Choctaw Integration in Celtic Communities

Choctaw vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $43,621, a difference of 21.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $98,896, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $101,139, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $50,447, a difference of 11.0%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $38,283, a difference of 13.4%).
Choctaw vs Celtic Income
Income MetricChoctawCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
27.3%

Choctaw vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.7%), family poverty (11.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (20.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.7%).
Choctaw vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
10.9%

Choctaw vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.1%).
Choctaw vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawCeltic
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.4%

Choctaw vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.9%).
Choctaw vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
81.8%

Choctaw vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.3%).
Choctaw vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawCeltic
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Poor
33.3%

Choctaw vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.16%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
Choctaw vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.1%

Choctaw vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 36.0%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 33.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Choctaw vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.9%

Choctaw vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 27.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 11.5%).
Choctaw vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricChoctawCeltic
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%