Immigrants from Congo vs Celtic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Celtic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Celtics
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,574,150 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 35.9 Celtics.
Immigrants from Congo vs Celtic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $92,241, a difference of 27.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $98,896, a difference of 27.0%), and wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $38,283, a difference of 11.6%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $50,447, a difference of 16.6%), and median earnings ($39,169 compared to $45,732, a difference of 16.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Celtic |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,720 | Average $43,621 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,216 | Fair $101,139 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $66,768 | Fair $83,193 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,169 | Fair $45,732 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,204 | Average $54,242 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,317 | Tragic $38,283 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $43,266 | Tragic $50,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $72,178 | Fair $92,241 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $77,850 | Fair $98,896 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,393 | Average $60,608 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Celtic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 37.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (22.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 34.9%), and family poverty (11.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (33.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and single female poverty (25.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 11.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Celtic |
Poverty | Tragic 16.1% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.9% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 17.4% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.6% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.9% | Poor 17.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Fair 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.4% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.7% | Fair 17.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Celtic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Celtic |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Good 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Celtic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Celtic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.7% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 81.8% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Celtic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.3%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Celtic |
Family Households | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.0% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.1% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.1% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.8% | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 35.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Celtic |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 8.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 92.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.1% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Celtic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.4%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Celtic |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.7% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.8% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.6% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Average 14.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Good 1.9% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Celtic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 56.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.2%), and cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Celtic |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Average 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.7% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |