Immigrants from Jordan vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,147,873 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 49.7 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $101,171, a difference of 4.9%), and median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $54,508, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $96,497, a difference of 0.71%), householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $62,215, a difference of 1.3%), and per capita income ($45,066 compared to $44,206, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.7%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.40%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 9.6%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.57%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 39.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and college, under 1 year (67.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.0%).