Immigrants from Jamaica vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,580,105 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 31.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,035 compared to $101,171, a difference of 16.2%), and median family income ($89,268 compared to $103,624, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $40,019, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $52,979, a difference of 3.8%), and median earnings ($43,026 compared to $46,952, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 42.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.1%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 1.2%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.0%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 22.2%), and married-couple households (40.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.2%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 2.6%), no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.5%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 33.3%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and 3rd grade (97.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.2%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.6%).