Arapaho vs South American Indian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
South American Indian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
South American Indians
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
South American Indian Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,821,465 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.933. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.205% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 205.3 South American Indians.
Arapaho vs South American Indian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $44,206, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $96,497, a difference of 34.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $101,171, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $62,215, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $52,979, a difference of 20.4%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | South American Indian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Good $44,206 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Good $103,624 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Excellent $87,446 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Good $46,952 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Average $54,508 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Good $40,019 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Excellent $52,979 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Good $96,497 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Good $101,171 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Good $62,215 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Arapaho vs South American Indian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 81.0%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 52.6%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 14.3%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | South American Indian |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Fair 12.7% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Fair 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Fair 11.5% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Fair 13.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Average 20.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Average 17.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Average 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Fair 16.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Average 29.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Average 11.9% |
Arapaho vs South American Indian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 139.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 130.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 126.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | South American Indian |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Fair 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Fair 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Fair 5.5% |
Arapaho vs South American Indian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | South American Indian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Good 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Good 82.9% |
Arapaho vs South American Indian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 48.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 10.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | South American Indian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Exceptional 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Excellent 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Poor 45.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Average 31.7% |
Arapaho vs South American Indian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 64.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 49.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 38.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | South American Indian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 88.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Tragic 53.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Average 6.3% |
Arapaho vs South American Indian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 69.3%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 65.4%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.46%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | South American Indian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Tragic 92.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Average 65.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Good 60.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Good 47.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Excellent 39.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Excellent 15.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Excellent 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Excellent 2.0% |
Arapaho vs South American Indian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.1%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.7%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | South American Indian |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Good 23.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |