Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,440,220 people shows no correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,331 compared to $62,215, a difference of 10.4%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($43,363 compared to $40,019, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($103,197 compared to $103,624, a difference of 0.41%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,523 compared to $101,171, a difference of 0.64%), and median household income ($86,425 compared to $87,446, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 28.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.030%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.0%), births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 23.1%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.76%), married-couple households (45.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (63.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 121.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 72.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 20.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 42.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 59.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.4%), master's degree (17.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.29%), 4th grade (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and college, under 1 year (65.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 57.1%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.52%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 1.4%).