Pima vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,968,546 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 21.6 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $44,206, a difference of 44.3%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $87,446, a difference of 38.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $101,171, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,979, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,019, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $96,497, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 114.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 100.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 87.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 31.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 41.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 149.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 111.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 109.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 85.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 62.2%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.6%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 71.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 69.5%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 67.0%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 54.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.4%).