Romanian vs Portuguese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Portuguese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Portuguese

Excellent
Average
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Portuguese Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,267,714 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 41.0 Portuguese.
Romanian Integration in Portuguese Communities

Romanian vs Portuguese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $44,362, a difference of 9.2%), median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $56,663, a difference of 6.0%), and median family income ($111,243 compared to $106,286, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $54,436, a difference of 1.5%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,544 compared to $99,429, a difference of 3.1%).
Romanian vs Portuguese Income
Income MetricRomanianPortuguese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Good
$44,362
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Excellent
$106,286
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Exceptional
$88,976
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Exceptional
$48,032
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Excellent
$56,663
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Good
$40,177
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Exceptional
$54,436
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Exceptional
$99,429
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Exceptional
$105,309
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Good
$61,440
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Romanian vs Portuguese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.93%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Romanian vs Portuguese Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianPortuguese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
17.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Excellent
20.5%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
12.2%

Romanian vs Portuguese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Romanian vs Portuguese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianPortuguese
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
5.6%

Romanian vs Portuguese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.79%).
Romanian vs Portuguese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianPortuguese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
64.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Fair
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
82.2%

Romanian vs Portuguese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 17.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.23%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Romanian vs Portuguese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianPortuguese
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
33.8%

Romanian vs Portuguese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 27.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.1%).
Romanian vs Portuguese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianPortuguese
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.4%

Romanian vs Portuguese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 30.0%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 23.3%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.31%).
Romanian vs Portuguese Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianPortuguese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Poor
93.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Tragic
92.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
63.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
44.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Poor
13.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
1.8%

Romanian vs Portuguese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.5%).
Romanian vs Portuguese Disability
Disability MetricRomanianPortuguese
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Fair
23.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Fair
47.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%