Choctaw vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,924,519 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 10.2 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $105,309, a difference of 28.0%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $88,976, a difference of 27.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $99,429, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $61,440, a difference of 15.8%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $56,663, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 42.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 39.2%), and family poverty (11.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.72%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.84%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.76%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 26.3%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.8% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.26%), 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 37.4%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.9%).