Czechoslovakian vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 322,516,655 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to a decrease of 15.5 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $54,436, a difference of 6.3%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $88,976, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $99,429, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,806 compared to $44,362, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $61,440, a difference of 1.4%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $56,663, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 18.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.18%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.72%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (64.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.46%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.0%), bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and associate's degree (46.0% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.9%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.0%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and disability (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.89%).