Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,887,908 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.796% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 795.7 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $44,362, a difference of 16.7%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $56,663, a difference of 9.8%), and median family income ($116,165 compared to $106,286, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $54,436, a difference of 0.16%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $105,309, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 26.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.020%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.010%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 37.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 43.3%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.9%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.4%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.5%).