Canadian vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 383,745,161 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 44.3 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $54,436, a difference of 4.0%), per capita income ($45,858 compared to $44,362, a difference of 3.4%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,911 compared to $48,032, a difference of 0.25%), median family income ($106,597 compared to $106,286, a difference of 0.29%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $105,309, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.31%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.5%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.88%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.090%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.0%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.5%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.56%), male disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.84%).