Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Immigrants from Ghana

Fair
Poor
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,716,602 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.796. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.229% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 229.0 Immigrants from Ghana.
Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 26.1%), median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $39,894, a difference of 18.1%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $81,489, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $51,836, a difference of 8.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $58,624, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $87,760, a difference of 12.3%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Income
Income MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ghana
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Tragic
$41,131
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Tragic
$96,544
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Tragic
$81,489
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Fair
$45,641
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Tragic
$51,836
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Good
$39,894
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Poor
$51,333
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Tragic
$87,760
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Tragic
$94,982
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Tragic
$58,624
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
22.3%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.0%), single female poverty (27.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and family poverty (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.1%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ghana
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
19.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.1%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ghana
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.2%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ghana
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Good
82.9%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ghana
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Tragic
42.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Tragic
34.5%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 110.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 50.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 10.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 42.3%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ghana
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
16.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
83.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
47.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
16.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.2%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 43.8%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 35.9%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.11%), high school diploma (87.8% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and 11th grade (91.8% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.61%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ghana
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Tragic
89.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
87.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
63.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Tragic
57.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Poor
44.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Fair
36.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Fair
1.8%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 77.0%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.8%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.5%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability
Disability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Ghana
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
24.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Poor
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Poor
2.5%