Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,327,876 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.330. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.068% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to a decrease of 68.2 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,417 compared to $41,131, a difference of 22.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,503 compared to $87,760, a difference of 19.1%), and wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $51,333, a difference of 5.9%), householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $58,624, a difference of 7.7%), and median female earnings ($43,258 compared to $39,894, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 41.9%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 38.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.87%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 46.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.53%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 27.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.7%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.2%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.0%).