Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Immigrants from Ghana

Exceptional
Poor
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,872,351 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 67.7 Immigrants from Ghana.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $41,131, a difference of 15.2%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and median family income ($108,830 compared to $96,544, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $51,333, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $39,894, a difference of 4.1%), and median earnings ($48,913 compared to $45,641, a difference of 7.2%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Ghana
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,394
Tragic
$41,131
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,830
Tragic
$96,544
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,496
Tragic
$81,489
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,913
Fair
$45,641
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,352
Tragic
$51,836
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,527
Good
$39,894
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,914
Poor
$51,333
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,880
Tragic
$87,760
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$104,992
Tragic
$94,982
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,643
Tragic
$58,624
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Exceptional
22.3%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 41.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.3%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 3.7%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.3%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Ghana
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.1%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.5%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.9%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Ghana
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Ghana
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Good
82.9%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 29.5%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.090%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Ghana
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Tragic
42.7%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
34.5%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 68.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 17.3%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Ghana
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
16.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Tragic
83.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.6%
Tragic
47.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Tragic
16.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Tragic
5.2%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Ghana
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
89.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Tragic
87.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Tragic
63.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Tragic
57.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Poor
44.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.6%
Fair
36.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.9%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.63%), male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Ghana
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
24.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Poor
47.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Poor
2.5%