Japanese vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,778,216 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,624 compared to $87,760, a difference of 4.4%), and median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $39,894, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $51,836, a difference of 0.71%), median family income ($97,288 compared to $96,544, a difference of 0.77%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $58,624, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.8%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.18%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.0%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 76.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.5%), master's degree (12.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.76%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.0%), male disability (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.20%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.8%).