Canadian vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,061,738 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 4.2 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 26.2%), per capita income ($45,858 compared to $41,131, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $87,760, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $39,894, a difference of 0.43%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $51,333, a difference of 1.9%), and median earnings ($47,911 compared to $45,641, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 33.9%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 32.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.31%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.4%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 34.8%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 15.4%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 99.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 10.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 29.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 55.6%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.7%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and male disability (12.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.0%).